Comparison

Quartiers d'oranges confits vs Himbeeren in weißer Schokolade

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientQuartiers d'oranges confitsHimbeeren in weißer Schokola...
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 396 kcal 403 kcal
Fat 13 g 23 g
Saturated fat 7.6 g 13.7 g
Sugars 58 g 41.5 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.1 g
Fiber 3.8 g —
Protein 2.9 g 5.1 g
Additives11
AllergensSoybeansMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Quartiers d'oranges confits has 43% less fat (13 g vs 23 g).
  • Quartiers d'oranges confits has 45% less saturated fat (7.6 g vs 13.7 g).
  • Himbeeren in weißer Schokolade has 28% less sugar (41.5 g vs 58 g).
  • Himbeeren in weißer Schokolade has 43% more protein (5.1 g vs 2.9 g).
  • Only Quartiers d'oranges confits lists: Soybeans.
  • Only Himbeeren in weißer Schokolade lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Quartiers d'oranges confits

Quarts de tranches d'oranges 37%, sucre, pâte de cacao, sirop de glucose fructose, beurre de cacao, émulsifiant : lécithines (_soja_, tournesol et/ou colza), arôme naturel de vanille. Cacao : 72% minimum. Peut contenir des traces de lait, céréales contenant du gluten, œufs et fruits à coque.

Himbeeren in weißer Schokolade

Weiße Schokolade 52 %, (Zucker, Kakaobutter: Vollmilchpulver, Emulgator: Lecithine (aus Soja), natürliches Vanillearoma, Himbeeren 48 %. Kann Spuren von Nüssen und Erdnüssen enthalten.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Quartiers d'oranges confits or Himbeeren in weißer Schokolade?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Quartiers d'oranges confits has fewer calories: 396 kcal versus 403 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Himbeeren in weißer Schokolade has less sugar: 41.5 g versus 58 g per 100 g.

More comparisons