Quartiers de pommes de terre cuites vs Sous Vide matpotet
Overall, Sous Vide matpotet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Quartiers de pommes de terre cuites
Sous Vide matpotet
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Quartiers de pommes de terre... | Sous Vide matpotet |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | 1 |
| Calories | 77 kcal | 80 kcal |
| Fat | 1 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.7 g | 1.7 g |
| Salt | 0.4 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 2.1 g | 2 g |
| Protein | 2 g | 1.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Sous Vide matpotet has 90% less fat (0.1 g vs 1 g).
- Quartiers de pommes de terre cuites has 59% less sugar (0.7 g vs 1.7 g).
- Sous Vide matpotet has no salt, while Quartiers de pommes de terre cuites has 0.4 g.
- Sous Vide matpotet is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Quartiers de pommes de terre cuites
Pommes de terre (Provenance: voir date), Sel
Sous Vide matpotet
Potet (100%)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Quartiers de pommes de terre cuites or Sous Vide matpotet?
Overall, Sous Vide matpotet has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Quartiers de pommes de terre cuites has fewer calories: 77 kcal versus 80 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Quartiers de pommes de terre cuites has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 1.7 g per 100 g.