Comparison

Putenbrust vs Bio Wiener

Overall, Putenbrust has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPutenbrustBio Wiener
Nutri-Score d e
NOVA group — 4
Calories 105 kcal 266 kcal
Fat 2 g 23 g
Saturated fat 0.5 g 9.2 g
Sugars 0.5 g 0.5 g
Salt 2.2 g 2 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 21 g 13.8 g
Additives04
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Putenbrust has 61% fewer calories (105 kcal vs 266 kcal).
  • Putenbrust has 91% less fat (2 g vs 23 g).
  • Putenbrust has 95% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 9.2 g).
  • Putenbrust has 34% more protein (21 g vs 13.8 g).
  • Putenbrust has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Putenbrust

Not available.

Bio Wiener

65% Schweinefleisch*, 20% Rindfleisch*, Wasser, Speck, Meersalz, Maltodextrin*, Stabilisator: Natriumcitrate; Dextrose*, Gewürze*, Antioxidationsmittel: Ascorbinsäure, Natriumascorbat; Gewürzextrakte, Konservierungsstoff: Natriumnitrit; Schafsaitling, Rauch. Das Produkt kann Spuren von Milch und Senf enthalten.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Putenbrust or Bio Wiener?

Overall, Putenbrust has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Putenbrust has fewer calories: 105 kcal versus 266 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Putenbrust has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons