Fussball-Bockwurst vs Bio Wiener
Overall, Bio Wiener has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Fussball-Bockwurst | Bio Wiener |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 268 kcal | 266 kcal |
| Fat | 24 g | 23 g |
| Saturated fat | 9.6 g | 9.2 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 12 g | 2 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 0.6 g | 13.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 4 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bio Wiener has 50% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1 g).
- Bio Wiener has 83% less salt (2 g vs 12 g).
- Bio Wiener has 96% more protein (13.8 g vs 0.6 g).
Ingredients
Fussball-Bockwurst
Not available.
Bio Wiener
65% Schweinefleisch*, 20% Rindfleisch*, Wasser, Speck, Meersalz, Maltodextrin*, Stabilisator: Natriumcitrate; Dextrose*, Gewürze*, Antioxidationsmittel: Ascorbinsäure, Natriumascorbat; Gewürzextrakte, Konservierungsstoff: Natriumnitrit; Schafsaitling, Rauch. Das Produkt kann Spuren von Milch und Senf enthalten.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Fussball-Bockwurst or Bio Wiener?
Overall, Bio Wiener has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Bio Wiener has fewer calories: 266 kcal versus 268 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bio Wiener has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1 g per 100 g.