Comparison

Pure fodant vs Fondant Decke

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPure fodantFondant Decke
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 425 kcal 398 kcal
Fat 25 g 7.3 g
Saturated fat 14 g 3.6 g
Sugars 37 g 76 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Fiber 2.7 g —
Protein 4.8 g 0 g
Additives46
AllergensEggs, Gluten, Milk, SoybeansNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Fondant Decke has 71% less fat (7.3 g vs 25 g).
  • Fondant Decke has 74% less saturated fat (3.6 g vs 14 g).
  • Pure fodant has 51% less sugar (37 g vs 76 g).
  • Pure fodant has 100% more protein (4.8 g vs 0 g).
  • Only Pure fodant lists: Eggs, Gluten, Milk, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Pure fodant

œuf*, sucre, 23% chocolat noir (pâte de cacao, sucre, cacao en poudre, émulsifiant: lécithines (soja); arôme naturel de vanille), beurre (lait), préparation de matière grasse (graisses vegetales (palme, coprah), huile de colza, eau, émulsifiant: mono - et diglycérides d'acides gras**; acidifiant: acide citrique), farine de blé, sel. *issu de poules élevées au sol. **d'origine végétale. Chocolat noir: cacao: 57% minimum. Peut contenir des traces de fruits à coque.

Fondant Decke

Zucker, Glukosesirup, Palmfett, Wasser, Feuchthaltemittel (Glycerin), Verdickungsmittel (E 466, Traganth), Emulgator (E 472c), natürliches Aroma, Konservierungsstoff (Kaliumsorbat), Säureregulator (Citronensäure). Kann enthalten: MANDELN, HASELNÜSSE, WALNÜSSE, PISTAZIEN.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Pure fodant or Fondant Decke?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Fondant Decke has fewer calories: 398 kcal versus 425 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pure fodant has less sugar: 37 g versus 76 g per 100 g.

More comparisons