Pueblo London vs Hagelslag puur
Overall, Pueblo London has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pueblo London | Hagelslag puur |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 213 kcal | 441 kcal |
| Fat | 21.4 g | 15 g |
| Saturated fat | 6 g | 8.9 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 65 g |
| Salt | 1.7 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 6.6 g |
| Protein | 5 g | 5.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pueblo London has 52% fewer calories (213 kcal vs 441 kcal).
- Hagelslag puur has 30% less fat (15 g vs 21.4 g).
- Pueblo London has 33% less saturated fat (6 g vs 8.9 g).
- Pueblo London has 98% less sugar (1 g vs 65 g).
- Hagelslag puur has 94% less salt (0.1 g vs 1.7 g).
- Hagelslag puur has 100% more fiber (6.6 g vs 0 g).
- Pueblo London has the better Nutri-Score.
- Pueblo London is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Pueblo London lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Pueblo London
Pasteurized whole milk, rennet, salt.
Hagelslag puur
Suiker, cacaomassa, magere cacaopoeder, dextrose, emulgator: raapzaadlecithine, glansmiddel: arabische gom, Chocoladehagelslag: ten minste 32% cacaobestanddelen,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pueblo London or Hagelslag puur?
Overall, Pueblo London has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pueblo London has fewer calories: 213 kcal versus 441 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pueblo London has less sugar: 1 g versus 65 g per 100 g.