Comparison

ProActiv original vs Matière grasse végétale à tartiner

Overall, ProActiv original has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientProActiv originalMatière grasse végétale à ta...
Nutri-Score c e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 315 kcal 713 kcal
Fat 35 g 79 g
Saturated fat 8 g 45 g
Sugars 0 g 0.5 g
Salt 0.3 g 1.7 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 0.5 g 0.5 g
Additives33
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • ProActiv original has 56% fewer calories (315 kcal vs 713 kcal).
  • ProActiv original has 56% less fat (35 g vs 79 g).
  • ProActiv original has 82% less saturated fat (8 g vs 45 g).
  • ProActiv original has no sugar, while Matière grasse végétale à tartiner has 0.5 g.
  • ProActiv original has 82% less salt (0.3 g vs 1.7 g).
  • ProActiv original has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

ProActiv original

Agua, aceites vegetales (girasol (13%), linaza (6%), nabina (4%)), grasa de palma, ésteres de esteroles vegetales (11%) (equivalen a esteroles vegetales (6,6%)), emulgentes (mono y diglicéridos de ácidos grasos, lecitina de girasol), sal (0,3%), aromas naturales, vitaminas (A, D).

Matière grasse végétale à tartiner

Huiles végétales (tournesol, colza en proportions variables), graisse de coco, eau, sel marin (1.7%), préparation à base de fève, émulsifiant (lécithine de tournesol), arôme naturel, colorant : caroténoïdes.

FAQ

Which is healthier: ProActiv original or Matière grasse végétale à tartiner?

Overall, ProActiv original has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

ProActiv original has fewer calories: 315 kcal versus 713 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

ProActiv original has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons