Comparison
Princesse Amandine vs Pommes de terres
Overall, Pommes de terres has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Princesse Amandine | Pommes de terres |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 81 kcal | 76 kcal |
| Fat | 0.3 g | 0.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.9 g | 0.2 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 1.8 g | 1.3 g |
| Protein | 1.8 g | 1.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pommes de terres has 77% less sugar (0.2 g vs 0.9 g).
- Princesse Amandine has 28% more fiber (1.8 g vs 1.3 g).
- Pommes de terres has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Princesse Amandine
pomme de terre
Pommes de terres
pommes de terre
FAQ
Which is healthier: Princesse Amandine or Pommes de terres?
Overall, Pommes de terres has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pommes de terres has fewer calories: 76 kcal versus 81 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pommes de terres has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.