Comparison
Princesse Amandine vs Pommes de terre
Overall, Pommes de terre has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Princesse Amandine | Pommes de terre |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 81 kcal | 74 kcal |
| Fat | 0.3 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.9 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.8 g | 2 g |
| Protein | 1.8 g | 2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pommes de terre has no fat, while Princesse Amandine has 0.3 g.
- Pommes de terre has 42% less sugar (0.5 g vs 0.9 g).
- Pommes de terre has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Princesse Amandine
pomme de terre
Pommes de terre
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Princesse Amandine or Pommes de terre?
Overall, Pommes de terre has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pommes de terre has fewer calories: 74 kcal versus 81 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pommes de terre has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.