Comparison
Suomalainen Yleisperuna vs Pommes de terre
Overall, Pommes de terre has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Suomalainen Yleisperuna | Pommes de terre |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 80 kcal | 74 kcal |
| Fat | 0.2 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | — | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1 g | 2 g |
| Protein | 2 g | 2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pommes de terre has 50% more fiber (2 g vs 1 g).
Ingredients
Suomalainen Yleisperuna
Not available.
Pommes de terre
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Suomalainen Yleisperuna or Pommes de terre?
Overall, Pommes de terre has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pommes de terre has fewer calories: 74 kcal versus 80 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pommes de terre has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.