Comparison
Pommes de terres vs Suomalainen Yleisperuna
Overall, Pommes de terres has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pommes de terres | Suomalainen Yleisperuna |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | — |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 76 kcal | 80 kcal |
| Fat | 0.3 g | 0.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.2 g | 0.6 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | — |
| Fiber | 1.3 g | 1 g |
| Protein | 1.9 g | 2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pommes de terres has 67% less sugar (0.2 g vs 0.6 g).
- Pommes de terres has 23% more fiber (1.3 g vs 1 g).
Ingredients
Pommes de terres
pommes de terre
Suomalainen Yleisperuna
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pommes de terres or Suomalainen Yleisperuna?
Overall, Pommes de terres has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pommes de terres has fewer calories: 76 kcal versus 80 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pommes de terres has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.