Comparison

Premium-Eistee - Erdbeer-Kiwigeschmack vs Makava delighted ice tea

Overall, Makava delighted ice tea has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 ml

NutrientPremium-Eistee - Erdbeer-Kiw...Makava delighted ice tea
Nutri-Score d c
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 29 kcal 21 kcal
Fat 0 g 0.1 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0.1 g
Sugars 7.1 g 5.1 g
Salt 0 g 0 g
Protein 0 g 0.1 g
Additives21
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Makava delighted ice tea has 28% fewer calories (21 kcal vs 29 kcal).
  • Makava delighted ice tea has 28% less sugar (5.1 g vs 7.1 g).
  • Makava delighted ice tea has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Makava delighted ice tea is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Premium-Eistee - Erdbeer-Kiwigeschmack

91 % Aufguss aus Hagebutten und Hibiskusblüten (Wasser, Hagebutten, Hibiskusblüten), Zucker, Zitronensaft aus Zitronensaftkonzentrat, Aroniasaft aus Aroniasaftkonzentrat, 0,3 % Erdbeersaft aus Erdbeersaftkonzentrat, 0,2 % Kiwisaft aus Kiwisaftkonzentrat, Säuerungsmittel: Citronensäure; Säureregulator: Natriumcitrate; natürliches Aroma.

Makava delighted ice tea

Tee (Quellwasser, Mate*, schwarzer Tee*), Zucker*, Zitronensaft aus Zitronensaftkonzentrat*, Holunderblütenextrakt*, Säuerungsmittel Citronensäure. *aus kontrolliert biologischem Anbau

FAQ

Which is healthier: Premium-Eistee - Erdbeer-Kiwigeschmack or Makava delighted ice tea?

Overall, Makava delighted ice tea has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Makava delighted ice tea has fewer calories: 21 kcal versus 29 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Makava delighted ice tea has less sugar: 5.1 g versus 7.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons