Comparison

Premium-Eistee - Erdbeer-Kiwigeschmack vs Captains Tea Eistee zero

Overall, Captains Tea Eistee zero has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 ml

NutrientPremium-Eistee - Erdbeer-Kiw...Captains Tea Eistee zero
Nutri-Score d c
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 29 kcal 3 kcal
Fat 0 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 7.1 g 0.4 g
Salt 0 g 0.1 g
Protein 0 g 0.1 g
Additives26
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Captains Tea Eistee zero has 90% fewer calories (3 kcal vs 29 kcal).
  • Captains Tea Eistee zero has 94% less sugar (0.4 g vs 7.1 g).
  • Captains Tea Eistee zero has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Premium-Eistee - Erdbeer-Kiwigeschmack

91 % Aufguss aus Hagebutten und Hibiskusblüten (Wasser, Hagebutten, Hibiskusblüten), Zucker, Zitronensaft aus Zitronensaftkonzentrat, Aroniasaft aus Aroniasaftkonzentrat, 0,3 % Erdbeersaft aus Erdbeersaftkonzentrat, 0,2 % Kiwisaft aus Kiwisaftkonzentrat, Säuerungsmittel: Citronensäure; Säureregulator: Natriumcitrate; natürliches Aroma.

Captains Tea Eistee zero

Wasser, Invertzuckersirup, Säuerungsmittel: Citronensäure; 0,12% Schwarztee-Extrakt, Aroma, Säureregulator: Natriumcitrate; Süßungsmittel: Cyclamat, Acesulfam K, Aspartam; Pfirsichsaftkonzentrat, Antioxidationsmittel: Ascorbinsäure. Enthält eine Phenylalaninquelle.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Premium-Eistee - Erdbeer-Kiwigeschmack or Captains Tea Eistee zero?

Overall, Captains Tea Eistee zero has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Captains Tea Eistee zero has fewer calories: 3 kcal versus 29 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Captains Tea Eistee zero has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 7.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons