Comparison

Captains Tea Eistee zero vs Lipton ice tea Limone

Overall, Captains Tea Eistee zero has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 ml

NutrientCaptains Tea Eistee zeroLipton ice tea Limone
Nutri-Score c d
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 3 kcal 19 kcal
Fat 0 g 0.5 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0.1 g
Sugars 0.4 g 4.5 g
Salt 0.1 g 0.1 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 0.1 g 0.5 g
Additives63
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Captains Tea Eistee zero has 84% fewer calories (3 kcal vs 19 kcal).
  • Captains Tea Eistee zero has no fat, while Lipton ice tea Limone has 0.5 g.
  • Captains Tea Eistee zero has 91% less sugar (0.4 g vs 4.5 g).
  • Lipton ice tea Limone has 80% more protein (0.5 g vs 0.1 g).
  • Captains Tea Eistee zero has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Captains Tea Eistee zero

Wasser, Invertzuckersirup, Säuerungsmittel: Citronensäure; 0,12% Schwarztee-Extrakt, Aroma, Säureregulator: Natriumcitrate; Süßungsmittel: Cyclamat, Acesulfam K, Aspartam; Pfirsichsaftkonzentrat, Antioxidationsmittel: Ascorbinsäure. Enthält eine Phenylalaninquelle.

Lipton ice tea Limone

Acqua, zucchero, estratto di te nero (0.12%), aromi, acidifiante: acido citico, succo di limone da concetrato (0.1%), antiossidante: acido ascorbico, correttore di acidita: citrati di sodio, edulcoranti: glicosidi steviolici.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Captains Tea Eistee zero or Lipton ice tea Limone?

Overall, Captains Tea Eistee zero has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Captains Tea Eistee zero has fewer calories: 3 kcal versus 19 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Captains Tea Eistee zero has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 4.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons