Eistee Pfirsich Geschmack vs Makava delighted ice tea
Overall, Makava delighted ice tea has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 ml
| Nutrient | Eistee Pfirsich Geschmack | Makava delighted ice tea |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 22 kcal | 21 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 5 g | 5.1 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Additives | 4 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Ingredients
Eistee Pfirsich Geschmack
Wasser, Zucker, Säuerungsmittel: Citronensäure, 0.12% Schwarztee-Extrakt, Aroma, Säureregulator: Natriumcitrate; konzentrierter Steviablätter-Aufguss (Wasser, Steviablätter), Pfirsichsaftkonzentrat, Antioxidationsmittel: Ascorbinsäure
Makava delighted ice tea
Tee (Quellwasser, Mate*, schwarzer Tee*), Zucker*, Zitronensaft aus Zitronensaftkonzentrat*, Holunderblütenextrakt*, Säuerungsmittel Citronensäure. *aus kontrolliert biologischem Anbau
FAQ
Which is healthier: Eistee Pfirsich Geschmack or Makava delighted ice tea?
Overall, Makava delighted ice tea has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Makava delighted ice tea has fewer calories: 21 kcal versus 22 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Eistee Pfirsich Geschmack has less sugar: 5 g versus 5.1 g per 100 g.