Predator vs Linx
Overall, Linx has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Predator | Linx |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 14 kcal | 46 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 13.5 g | 10.5 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0 g | 0.4 g |
| Additives | 7 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Predator has 69% fewer calories (14 kcal vs 46 kcal).
- Linx has 22% less sugar (10.5 g vs 13.5 g).
- Linx has 100% more protein (0.4 g vs 0 g).
- Linx has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Predator
Eau Gazéifiée, Sucre, Acidifiants (Acide Citrique, Acide Tartrique), Correcteur d'acidité (Citrate De Sodium), Arôme naturel et artificiel, Taurine (0,1%), Conservateurs (Sorbate De Potassium, Benzoate De Sodium), Caféine (0,03%), Vitamines (B3, B6), Colorants (E110*, E120*), Inositol (0,001%).
Linx
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Predator or Linx?
Overall, Linx has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Predator has fewer calories: 14 kcal versus 46 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Linx has less sugar: 10.5 g versus 13.5 g per 100 g.