Monster Energy Zero Ultra White vs Linx
Overall, Monster Energy Zero Ultra White has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Monster Energy Zero Ultra Wh... | Linx |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 2 kcal | 46 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 10.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 0.2 g | 0.4 g |
| Additives | 6 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Monster Energy Zero Ultra White has 95% fewer calories (2 kcal vs 46 kcal).
- Monster Energy Zero Ultra White has no sugar, while Linx has 10.5 g.
Ingredients
Monster Energy Zero Ultra White
Agua carbonatada, ácido cítrico, taurina (0,4%), citratos de sodio, aromas, extracto de raíz de Panax ginseng (0,08%), sucralosa, acesulfamo K, ácido sórbico, ácido benzoico, cafeína (0,03%), L-carnitina L-tartrato (0,015%), niacina, ácido pantoténico, B6, B12, cloruro sódico, D-glucoronolactona, extracto de semilla de guaraná (0,002%), inositol.
Linx
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Monster Energy Zero Ultra White or Linx?
Overall, Monster Energy Zero Ultra White has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Monster Energy Zero Ultra White has fewer calories: 2 kcal versus 46 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Monster Energy Zero Ultra White has less sugar: 0 g versus 10.5 g per 100 g.