Comparison

Pousses de haricots mungo - Bocal 175g vs Pousse de Haricot Mungo

Overall, Pousses de haricots mungo - Bocal 175g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPousses de haricots mungo -...Pousse de Haricot Mungo
Nutri-Score b b
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 28 kcal 19 kcal
Fat 0.2 g 0 g
Saturated fat 0 g 0 g
Sugars 0.4 g 2.1 g
Salt 0.6 g 0.7 g
Fiber 2.7 g 1.1 g
Protein 1.6 g 1 g
Additives22
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pousse de Haricot Mungo has 32% fewer calories (19 kcal vs 28 kcal).
  • Pousses de haricots mungo - Bocal 175g has 81% less sugar (0.4 g vs 2.1 g).
  • Pousses de haricots mungo - Bocal 175g has 59% more fiber (2.7 g vs 1.1 g).
  • Pousses de haricots mungo - Bocal 175g has 38% more protein (1.6 g vs 1 g).
  • Pousses de haricots mungo - Bocal 175g is less processed (lower NOVA group).

Ingredients

Pousses de haricots mungo - Bocal 175g

Pousses de haricots mungo*, eau, sucre de canne*, vinaigre de vin blanc*, sel, acidifiant : acide citrique, antioxydant : acide ascorbique. * Ingrédient issu de l'agriculture biologique

Pousse de Haricot Mungo

Eau, pousses de haricot mungo, sucre, vinaigre de vin blanc, sel, acidifiant : acide citrique, antioxydant : acide ascorbique, arôme nature d'estragon avec autres arômes naturels.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Pousses de haricots mungo - Bocal 175g or Pousse de Haricot Mungo?

Overall, Pousses de haricots mungo - Bocal 175g has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pousse de Haricot Mungo has fewer calories: 19 kcal versus 28 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pousses de haricots mungo - Bocal 175g has less sugar: 0.4 g versus 2.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons