Pousses de bambou vs Pousses de bambou en tranches à l'eau
Overall, Pousses de bambou en tranches à l'eau has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Pousses de bambou
Pousses de bambou en tranches à l'eau
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pousses de bambou | Pousses de bambou en tranche... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 34 kcal | 13 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | — | 0.8 g |
| Protein | 2 g | 0.8 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pousses de bambou en tranches à l'eau has 62% fewer calories (13 kcal vs 34 kcal).
- Pousses de bambou en tranches à l'eau has 60% less fat (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
- Pousses de bambou has 60% more protein (2 g vs 0.8 g).
Ingredients
Pousses de bambou
Pousse de bambou (52%), eau, régulateur d'acidité (acide ascorbique, acide citrique)
Pousses de bambou en tranches à l'eau
Pousses de bambou 55%, eau
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pousses de bambou or Pousses de bambou en tranches à l'eau?
Overall, Pousses de bambou en tranches à l'eau has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pousses de bambou en tranches à l'eau has fewer calories: 13 kcal versus 34 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pousses de bambou has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.