Poulet Rôti vs Filet de poulet rotis
Overall, Poulet Rôti has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Poulet Rôti
Filet de poulet rotis
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Poulet Rôti | Filet de poulet rotis |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 122 kcal | 137 kcal |
| Fat | 2 g | 3.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 0.8 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 1.5 g |
| Salt | 1.8 g | 1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 25 g | 25 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Poulet Rôti has 11% fewer calories (122 kcal vs 137 kcal).
- Poulet Rôti has 39% less fat (2 g vs 3.3 g).
- Poulet Rôti has 50% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 0.8 g).
- Poulet Rôti has 33% less sugar (1 g vs 1.5 g).
- Filet de poulet rotis has 44% less salt (1 g vs 1.8 g).
- Filet de poulet rotis has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Poulet Rôti
Filet de poulet, bouillons (eau, os de poulet, ail, plantes aromatiques, épices, sel), fécule de manioc, huile de colza, sel, caramel (sucre, sirop de glucose-fructose, eau), poivre 0.04%, épices, antioxydant : ascorbate de sodium, conservateur : nitrite de sodium.
Filet de poulet rotis
Filets de poulet, dextrose, fécule de manior, sel, arôme naturel, arôme naturel de poivre. Viande de poulet origine France. 110g de viande ont été utilisés pour la préparation de 100g de produit fini. Traces éventuelles de lait et céréales contenant du gluten.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Poulet Rôti or Filet de poulet rotis?
Overall, Poulet Rôti has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Poulet Rôti has fewer calories: 122 kcal versus 137 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Poulet Rôti has less sugar: 1 g versus 1.5 g per 100 g.