Comparison

Filet de poulet rotis vs Sweet and Salty Popcorn

Overall, Filet de poulet rotis has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientFilet de poulet rotisSweet and Salty Popcorn
Nutri-Score a c
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 137 kcal 470 kcal
Fat 3.3 g 20 g
Saturated fat 0.8 g 1.7 g
Sugars 1.5 g 15 g
Salt 1 g 0 g
Fiber — 7 g
Protein 25 g 7 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Filet de poulet rotis has 71% fewer calories (137 kcal vs 470 kcal).
  • Filet de poulet rotis has 84% less fat (3.3 g vs 20 g).
  • Filet de poulet rotis has 53% less saturated fat (0.8 g vs 1.7 g).
  • Filet de poulet rotis has 90% less sugar (1.5 g vs 15 g).
  • Sweet and Salty Popcorn has no salt, while Filet de poulet rotis has 1 g.
  • Filet de poulet rotis has 72% more protein (25 g vs 7 g).
  • Filet de poulet rotis has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Filet de poulet rotis

Filets de poulet, dextrose, fécule de manior, sel, arôme naturel, arôme naturel de poivre. Viande de poulet origine France. 110g de viande ont été utilisés pour la préparation de 100g de produit fini. Traces éventuelles de lait et céréales contenant du gluten.

Sweet and Salty Popcorn

00 509408 ays 9a Can f www er nacl Lei 6,c/ e prod Kand igh gister the WALKERS Loga, averag ts C2023. SNAKTAST C Delicious Sweet & Salty Hepcorn 200ge

FAQ

Which is healthier: Filet de poulet rotis or Sweet and Salty Popcorn?

Overall, Filet de poulet rotis has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Filet de poulet rotis has fewer calories: 137 kcal versus 470 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Filet de poulet rotis has less sugar: 1.5 g versus 15 g per 100 g.

More comparisons