Comparison

Pot au feu vs Pot au feu

Overall, Pot au feu has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPot au feuPot au feu
Nutri-Score a —
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 65 kcal 66 kcal
Fat 2.2 g 2 g
Saturated fat 0.7 g 0.9 g
Sugars 2 g 1.5 g
Salt 0.5 g 0.1 g
Fiber — 1.5 g
Protein 7.2 g 2.8 g
Additives10
AllergensCelery, Gluten, Molluscs, MustardMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pot au feu has 25% less sugar (1.5 g vs 2 g).
  • Pot au feu has 88% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Pot au feu has 61% more protein (7.2 g vs 2.8 g).
  • Pot au feu is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Pot au feu lists: Celery, Gluten, Molluscs, Mustard.
  • Only Pot au feu lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Pot au feu

Eau - jarret de boeuf traité en salaison 26% [jarret de boeuf (origine : France), eau, sel] - carotte 18% - navet 13% - poireau 9% - oignon grelot - arôme naturel - gélatine bovine - sel - poireau en poudre - CÉLERI en poudre - oignon en poudre - ail en poudre - poivre - thym en poudre - laurier en poudre. Traces de CRUSTACÉS, POISSONS, OEUFS, FRUITS À COQUE, fait, SOJA, GLUTEN, MOUTARDE, MOLLUSQUES.

Pot au feu

Pomme de terre* 34%, eau, carotte* 16%, viande de bœuf* 8,2%, petit pois* 5%, poireau* 4,8%, navet* 3,8%, oignon*, fécule de manioc*, beurre* (contient _lait_), huile de tournesol*, huile de colza*, persil*, ail*, thym*, poivre noir*, laurier*, girofle*. * biologique. Bœuf origine France.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Pot au feu or Pot au feu?

Overall, Pot au feu has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pot au feu has fewer calories: 65 kcal versus 66 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pot au feu has less sugar: 1.5 g versus 2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons