Pot-au-feu sans os vs Pot au feu
Overall, Pot au feu has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pot-au-feu sans os | Pot au feu |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | — |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 204 kcal | 66 kcal |
| Fat | 14 g | 2 g |
| Saturated fat | 5.9 g | 0.9 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 1.5 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 1.5 g |
| Protein | 20 g | 2.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pot au feu has 68% fewer calories (66 kcal vs 204 kcal).
- Pot au feu has 86% less fat (2 g vs 14 g).
- Pot au feu has 85% less saturated fat (0.9 g vs 5.9 g).
- Pot-au-feu sans os has no sugar, while Pot au feu has 1.5 g.
- Pot au feu has 100% more fiber (1.5 g vs 0 g).
- Pot-au-feu sans os has 86% more protein (20 g vs 2.8 g).
- Only Pot au feu lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Pot-au-feu sans os
Viande bovine française (jarret et plat de côté). Animaux nés, élevés, abattus, découpés en France
Pot au feu
Pomme de terre* 34%, eau, carotte* 16%, viande de bœuf* 8,2%, petit pois* 5%, poireau* 4,8%, navet* 3,8%, oignon*, fécule de manioc*, beurre* (contient _lait_), huile de tournesol*, huile de colza*, persil*, ail*, thym*, poivre noir*, laurier*, girofle*. * biologique. Bœuf origine France.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pot-au-feu sans os or Pot au feu?
Overall, Pot au feu has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pot au feu has fewer calories: 66 kcal versus 204 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pot-au-feu sans os has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.5 g per 100 g.