Comparison

Pot au feu vs Mélange pot au feu

Overall, Pot au feu has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 4.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPot au feuMélange pot au feu
Nutri-Score a d
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 65 kcal 40 kcal
Fat 2.2 g 0.3 g
Saturated fat 0.7 g 0.1 g
Sugars 2 g 3.5 g
Salt 0.5 g 9.7 g
Fiber — 2.5 g
Protein 7.2 g 1.1 g
Additives10
AllergensCelery, Gluten, Molluscs, MustardNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Mélange pot au feu has 38% fewer calories (40 kcal vs 65 kcal).
  • Mélange pot au feu has 86% less fat (0.3 g vs 2.2 g).
  • Mélange pot au feu has 86% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.7 g).
  • Pot au feu has 43% less sugar (2 g vs 3.5 g).
  • Pot au feu has 95% less salt (0.5 g vs 9.7 g).
  • Pot au feu has 85% more protein (7.2 g vs 1.1 g).
  • Pot au feu has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Mélange pot au feu is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Pot au feu lists: Celery, Gluten, Molluscs, Mustard.

Ingredients

Pot au feu

Eau - jarret de boeuf traité en salaison 26% [jarret de boeuf (origine : France), eau, sel] - carotte 18% - navet 13% - poireau 9% - oignon grelot - arôme naturel - gélatine bovine - sel - poireau en poudre - CÉLERI en poudre - oignon en poudre - ail en poudre - poivre - thym en poudre - laurier en poudre. Traces de CRUSTACÉS, POISSONS, OEUFS, FRUITS À COQUE, fait, SOJA, GLUTEN, MOUTARDE, MOLLUSQUES.

Mélange pot au feu

Carotte", poireau, navet("), oignon,

FAQ

Which is healthier: Pot au feu or Mélange pot au feu?

Overall, Pot au feu has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Mélange pot au feu has fewer calories: 40 kcal versus 65 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pot au feu has less sugar: 2 g versus 3.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons