Comparison

Postre de soja Frutas del bosque vs Soja fruits rouges

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPostre de soja Frutas del bo...Soja fruits rouges
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 83 kcal 81 kcal
Fat 2.2 g 1.7 g
Saturated fat 0.3 g 0.3 g
Sugars 11 g 11 g
Salt 0 g 0.1 g
Fiber — 1.5 g
Protein 3.8 g 3.1 g
Additives52
AllergensSoybeansSoybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Soja fruits rouges has 23% less fat (1.7 g vs 2.2 g).
  • Postre de soja Frutas del bosque has 18% more protein (3.8 g vs 3.1 g).

Ingredients

Postre de soja Frutas del bosque

78% base de _soja_ (agua, 11% habas de _soja_), azúcar, 2,4% grosellas negras (0,9% procedente de zumo concentrado), 1,6% frambuesas (0,6% procedente de puré), 1,5% moras, 1,5% fresas, jarabe de glucosa y fructosa , almidón modificado de maíz, citratos de calcio (E333iii), zumo de uva roja concentrado, zumo de remolacha roja concentrado, estabilizante: goma garrofín (E410), correctores de la acidez: citratos de sodio (E331) y ácido cítrico (E330)

Soja fruits rouges

Jus de _soja_ 76% (eau, graines de _soja_ 7,1%), fruits rouges 10% (myrtille 2,9%, fraise 2,9%, mûre 2,8%, framboise 1,3%), sucre 9,9%, amidon de maïs, jus de citron concentré, épaississants: pectines et gomme guar, arômes naturels, concentré d'hibiscus et de carotte, sel, ferments. Peut contenir des traces de fruits à coque.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Postre de soja Frutas del bosque or Soja fruits rouges?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Soja fruits rouges has fewer calories: 81 kcal versus 83 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Postre de soja Frutas del bosque has less sugar: 11 g versus 11 g per 100 g.

More comparisons