Pork cabanossi vs Salamisticks
Overall, Pork cabanossi has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pork cabanossi | Salamisticks |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | e |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 451 kcal | 517 kcal |
| Fat | 36 g | 44 g |
| Saturated fat | 14 g | 17 g |
| Sugars | 2.2 g | 1.9 g |
| Salt | 3.2 g | 2.7 g |
| Fiber | 1.7 g | — |
| Protein | 23 g | 24 g |
| Additives | 10 | 3 |
| Allergens | Mustard, Pork | Celery, Milk, Mustard, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pork cabanossi has 13% fewer calories (451 kcal vs 517 kcal).
- Pork cabanossi has 18% less fat (36 g vs 44 g).
- Pork cabanossi has 18% less saturated fat (14 g vs 17 g).
- Salamisticks has 14% less sugar (1.9 g vs 2.2 g).
- Salamisticks has 14% less salt (2.7 g vs 3.2 g).
- Only Pork cabanossi lists: Pork.
- Only Salamisticks lists: Celery, Milk, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Pork cabanossi
Pork, Potato Starch, Pork Fat, Salt, Spices (contain Mustard), Spice Extracts, Smoke Flavouring, Dextrose, Sugar, Pork Protein, Acidity Regulator: Calcium Lactate; Stabilisers: Sodium Acetate, Sodium Citrates; Flavour Enhancer: Monosodium Glutamate; Antioxidant: Sodium Erythorbate; Preservative: Sodium Nitrite; Edible Alginate Casing (Gelling Agent: Sodium Alginate; Stabilisers: Cellulose, Calcium Chloride). Filled Into Edible Alginate Casings. Made with 158g of pork per 100g of finished product.
Salamisticks
Schweinefleisch, Stärke 2,7 Schweinefett, Speisesalz, Gewürze, Gewürzextrakte, Aromen, Schweineprotein 0,5%, Zucker, Antioxidationsmittel: Natriumascorbal, onservierungsstoi. Natriumnitrit, essbare Wursthülle aus Alginat ermittet: Natriumalginat, Stabilisatoren: Cellulose, Calciumchord), Das Produkt kann Spuren von: Sojabohnen, Milch schalenfrüchten, Sellerie und Senf enthalten.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pork cabanossi or Salamisticks?
Overall, Pork cabanossi has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pork cabanossi has fewer calories: 451 kcal versus 517 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Salamisticks has less sugar: 1.9 g versus 2.2 g per 100 g.