Pork cabanossi vs Kabanosy wieprzowe
Overall, Kabanosy wieprzowe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 4.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pork cabanossi | Kabanosy wieprzowe |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 451 kcal | 507 kcal |
| Fat | 36 g | 42 g |
| Saturated fat | 14 g | 17 g |
| Sugars | 2.2 g | 1.9 g |
| Salt | 3.2 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.7 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 23 g | 26 g |
| Additives | 10 | 2 |
| Allergens | Mustard, Pork | Pork |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pork cabanossi has 11% fewer calories (451 kcal vs 507 kcal).
- Pork cabanossi has 14% less fat (36 g vs 42 g).
- Pork cabanossi has 18% less saturated fat (14 g vs 17 g).
- Kabanosy wieprzowe has 14% less sugar (1.9 g vs 2.2 g).
- Kabanosy wieprzowe has no salt, while Pork cabanossi has 3.2 g.
- Pork cabanossi has 100% more fiber (1.7 g vs 0 g).
- Kabanosy wieprzowe has 12% more protein (26 g vs 23 g).
- Kabanosy wieprzowe has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Pork cabanossi lists: Mustard.
Ingredients
Pork cabanossi
Pork, Potato Starch, Pork Fat, Salt, Spices (contain Mustard), Spice Extracts, Smoke Flavouring, Dextrose, Sugar, Pork Protein, Acidity Regulator: Calcium Lactate; Stabilisers: Sodium Acetate, Sodium Citrates; Flavour Enhancer: Monosodium Glutamate; Antioxidant: Sodium Erythorbate; Preservative: Sodium Nitrite; Edible Alginate Casing (Gelling Agent: Sodium Alginate; Stabilisers: Cellulose, Calcium Chloride). Filled Into Edible Alginate Casings. Made with 158g of pork per 100g of finished product.
Kabanosy wieprzowe
pork, water, salt, dextrose, spices, spice extracts, antioxidant: sodium ascorbate, preservative: sodium nitrite, smoke
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pork cabanossi or Kabanosy wieprzowe?
Overall, Kabanosy wieprzowe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pork cabanossi has fewer calories: 451 kcal versus 507 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kabanosy wieprzowe has less sugar: 1.9 g versus 2.2 g per 100 g.