Comparison

Salamisticks vs Kabanos Exclusive Cheese

Overall, Kabanos Exclusive Cheese has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientSalamisticksKabanos Exclusive Cheese
Nutri-Score e e
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 517 kcal 493 kcal
Fat 44 g 42 g
Saturated fat 17 g 18 g
Sugars 1.9 g 1.4 g
Salt 2.7 g 2.1 g
Protein 24 g 25 g
Additives35
AllergensCelery, Milk, Mustard, SoybeansMilk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Kabanos Exclusive Cheese has 26% less sugar (1.4 g vs 1.9 g).
  • Kabanos Exclusive Cheese has 22% less salt (2.1 g vs 2.7 g).
  • Only Salamisticks lists: Celery, Mustard, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Salamisticks

Schweinefleisch, Stärke 2,7 Schweinefett, Speisesalz, Gewürze, Gewürzextrakte, Aromen, Schweineprotein 0,5%, Zucker, Antioxidationsmittel: Natriumascorbal, onservierungsstoi. Natriumnitrit, essbare Wursthülle aus Alginat ermittet: Natriumalginat, Stabilisatoren: Cellulose, Calciumchord), Das Produkt kann Spuren von: Sojabohnen, Milch schalenfrüchten, Sellerie und Senf enthalten.

Kabanos Exclusive Cheese

Poultry meat (chicken meat, turkey meat), pork meat, pork fat, _cheese_, starch, salt, spices, spice extracts, flavors (contain _milk_), pork protein, sugar, antioxidant: sodium ascorbate, preservative: sodium nitrite. Edible casing (gelling agent: sodium alginate, stabilizers: cellulose, calcium chloride)

FAQ

Which is healthier: Salamisticks or Kabanos Exclusive Cheese?

Overall, Kabanos Exclusive Cheese has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Kabanos Exclusive Cheese has fewer calories: 493 kcal versus 517 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Kabanos Exclusive Cheese has less sugar: 1.4 g versus 1.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons