Comparison

Pommes Duchesse A la Patate Douce vs Pommes duchesse

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPommes Duchesse A la Patate...Pommes duchesse
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 174 kcal 161 kcal
Fat 11 g 7.1 g
Saturated fat 5.3 g 0.8 g
Sugars 5.2 g 0.5 g
Salt 0.6 g 0.7 g
Fiber 2.7 g 2.2 g
Protein 2.6 g 2.2 g
Additives01
AllergensEggs, MilkNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pommes duchesse has 35% less fat (7.1 g vs 11 g).
  • Pommes duchesse has 85% less saturated fat (0.8 g vs 5.3 g).
  • Pommes duchesse has 90% less sugar (0.5 g vs 5.2 g).
  • Pommes Duchesse A la Patate Douce has 19% more fiber (2.7 g vs 2.2 g).
  • Pommes Duchesse A la Patate Douce has 15% more protein (2.6 g vs 2.2 g).
  • Pommes Duchesse A la Patate Douce is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Pommes Duchesse A la Patate Douce lists: Eggs, Milk.

Ingredients

Pommes Duchesse A la Patate Douce

Patate douce 51%, pomme de terre 21%, pomme de terre déshydratée 7,4%, _beurre_, eau, jaune d'_œuf_ en poudre, huile de tournesol, sel, curcuma, poivre blanc. Peut contenir des traces de céréales contenant du gluten, fruits à coque, céleri et soja.

Pommes duchesse

Pommes de terre 82 %, farine de riz, huile de tournesol 6,8 %, pommes de terre déshydratées, sel, amidon de pomme de terre, arômes naturels, dextrose, stabilisant : E464, curcuma. Traces de céleri et de lait.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Pommes Duchesse A la Patate Douce or Pommes duchesse?

Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pommes duchesse has fewer calories: 161 kcal versus 174 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pommes duchesse has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 5.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons