Comparison

Duchesses de patate douce vs Pommes duchesse

Overall, Pommes duchesse has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientDuchesses de patate doucePommes duchesse
Nutri-Score c c
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 174 kcal 161 kcal
Fat 11 g 7.1 g
Saturated fat 5.3 g 0.8 g
Sugars 5.2 g 0.5 g
Salt 0.6 g 0.7 g
Fiber 2.7 g 2.2 g
Protein 2.6 g 2.2 g
Additives01
AllergensEggs, Gluten, Milk, NutsNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pommes duchesse has 35% less fat (7.1 g vs 11 g).
  • Pommes duchesse has 85% less saturated fat (0.8 g vs 5.3 g).
  • Pommes duchesse has 90% less sugar (0.5 g vs 5.2 g).
  • Duchesses de patate douce has 19% more fiber (2.7 g vs 2.2 g).
  • Duchesses de patate douce has 15% more protein (2.6 g vs 2.2 g).
  • Only Duchesses de patate douce lists: Eggs, Gluten, Milk, Nuts.

Ingredients

Duchesses de patate douce

Patate douce (origine France) 51%, pomme de terre cuite (origine France) 21%, pomme de terre déshydratée (origine France) 7,4%, beurre (lait), eau, jaune d'œuf de poules élevées en plein air en poudre (oeufs), huile de tournesol, sel, curcuma, poivre blanc Présence éventuelle de céleri, gluten, fruits à coque

Pommes duchesse

Pommes de terre 82 %, farine de riz, huile de tournesol 6,8 %, pommes de terre déshydratées, sel, amidon de pomme de terre, arômes naturels, dextrose, stabilisant : E464, curcuma. Traces de céleri et de lait.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Duchesses de patate douce or Pommes duchesse?

Overall, Pommes duchesse has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pommes duchesse has fewer calories: 161 kcal versus 174 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pommes duchesse has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 5.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons