Pommes De Terre Cubes vs Ziemniaczki Już Gotowe z papryką
Overall, Pommes De Terre Cubes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pommes De Terre Cubes | Ziemniaczki Już Gotowe z pap... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 58 kcal | 88 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 1.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.2 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 1.9 g |
| Salt | 0.1 g | 0.6 g |
| Fiber | 1.5 g | 1.7 g |
| Protein | 1.4 g | 2.4 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pommes De Terre Cubes has 34% fewer calories (58 kcal vs 88 kcal).
- Pommes De Terre Cubes has 74% less fat (0.5 g vs 1.9 g).
- Pommes De Terre Cubes has 47% less sugar (1 g vs 1.9 g).
- Pommes De Terre Cubes has 83% less salt (0.1 g vs 0.6 g).
- Ziemniaczki Już Gotowe z papryką has 42% more protein (2.4 g vs 1.4 g).
- Pommes De Terre Cubes has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Pommes De Terre Cubes lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
Ingredients
Pommes De Terre Cubes
Pommes de terre, eau, sel, antioxydants : acide ascorbique, _disulfite_ de sodium
Ziemniaczki Już Gotowe z papryką
Ziemniaki 93%, olej rzepakowy, tłuszcze roślinne nieutwardzone (rzepak), przyprawy (w tym papryka 0,34 %), czosnek, cebula), sól, hydrolizat białka roślinnego (kukurydza), ekstrakty przypraw, cukier.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pommes De Terre Cubes or Ziemniaczki Już Gotowe z papryką?
Overall, Pommes De Terre Cubes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pommes De Terre Cubes has fewer calories: 58 kcal versus 88 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pommes De Terre Cubes has less sugar: 1 g versus 1.9 g per 100 g.