POM-BÄR Original vs Crunchips Paprika
Overall, POM-BÄR Original has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | POM-BÄR Original | Crunchips Paprika |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 516 kcal | 538 kcal |
| Fat | 27 g | 34 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.8 g | 2.6 g |
| Sugars | 2.2 g | 2.4 g |
| Salt | 1.5 g | 1.5 g |
| Fiber | 4.9 g | 4.4 g |
| Protein | 3 g | 5.7 g |
| Additives | 1 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | Milk |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- POM-BÄR Original has 21% less fat (27 g vs 34 g).
- POM-BÄR Original has 10% more fiber (4.9 g vs 4.4 g).
- Crunchips Paprika has 47% more protein (5.7 g vs 3 g).
- Only Crunchips Paprika lists: Milk.
Ingredients
POM-BÄR Original
Kartoffelpulver (31%), pflanzliche Öle (Sonnenblume, Raps in veränderlichen Gewichtsanteilen), Maisstärke, Kartoffelstärke, Zucker, jodiertes Speisesalz (Speisesalz, Kaliumjodat), Emulgator (Mono - und Diglyceride von Speisefettsäuren), Speisesalz, Hefeextrakt, Gewürz.
Crunchips Paprika
Kartoffeln, pflanzliche Öle (Sonnenblume, Raps in veränderlichen Gewichtsanteilen), Speisesalz, Süßmolken - pulver, Zucker, Paprikapulver, Dextrose, Zwiebelpulver, Käsepulver, Tomatenpulver, weißer Pfeffer, Aroma, Raucharoma, Hefe, Hefeextrakt, Farbstoff: Paprikaextrakt, Antioxidationsmittel: stark tocopherolhaltige Extrakte, Extrakt aus Rosmarin. Unter W Ungeöffnet
FAQ
Which is healthier: POM-BÄR Original or Crunchips Paprika?
Overall, POM-BÄR Original has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
POM-BÄR Original has fewer calories: 516 kcal versus 538 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
POM-BÄR Original has less sugar: 2.2 g versus 2.4 g per 100 g.