Comparison

Polvorón tradicional vs Pain aux figues et amandes

Overall, Pain aux figues et amandes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPolvorón tradicionalPain aux figues et amandes
Nutri-Score e c
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 517 kcal 288 kcal
Fat 26.9 g 4.7 g
Saturated fat 8.7 g 0.5 g
Sugars 25.6 g 48 g
Salt 0 g 0.2 g
Fiber 3.1 g 4.7 g
Protein 6.4 g 5 g
Additives20
AllergensGluten, Nuts, SoybeansNuts

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pain aux figues et amandes has 44% fewer calories (288 kcal vs 517 kcal).
  • Pain aux figues et amandes has 83% less fat (4.7 g vs 26.9 g).
  • Pain aux figues et amandes has 94% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 8.7 g).
  • Polvorón tradicional has 47% less sugar (25.6 g vs 48 g).
  • Pain aux figues et amandes has 34% more fiber (4.7 g vs 3.1 g).
  • Polvorón tradicional has 22% more protein (6.4 g vs 5 g).
  • Pain aux figues et amandes has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Pain aux figues et amandes is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Polvorón tradicional lists: Gluten, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Polvorón tradicional

Harina de _trigo_, azúcar, manteca de cerdo (grasa de cerdo, antioxidantes (extracto natural de romero (E392), ácido cítrico (E330))), _almendra_ 8%, canela, aromas (_soja_).

Pain aux figues et amandes

Figues (90%) et Amandes (10%). Peut contenir des petits morceaux de coquille.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Polvorón tradicional or Pain aux figues et amandes?

Overall, Pain aux figues et amandes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pain aux figues et amandes has fewer calories: 288 kcal versus 517 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Polvorón tradicional has less sugar: 25.6 g versus 48 g per 100 g.

More comparisons