Comparison
Polen granule vs Polen de flores
Overall, Polen granule has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Polen granule | Polen de flores |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 372 kcal | 396 kcal |
| Fat | 8.6 g | 6.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.2 g | 2.7 g |
| Sugars | 39.1 g | 38 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 12.6 g | — |
| Protein | 20.7 g | 18 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Polen de flores has 22% less fat (6.7 g vs 8.6 g).
- Polen granule has 19% less saturated fat (2.2 g vs 2.7 g).
- Polen granule has 13% more protein (20.7 g vs 18 g).
Ingredients
Polen granule
Polen granule 100%
Polen de flores
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Polen granule or Polen de flores?
Overall, Polen granule has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Polen granule has fewer calories: 372 kcal versus 396 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Polen de flores has less sugar: 38 g versus 39.1 g per 100 g.