Comparison

Plant-Based Bacon smoked vs This isn't bacon rashers

Overall, This isn't bacon rashers has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPlant-Based Bacon smokedThis isn't bacon rashers
Nutri-Score d a
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 218 kcal 120 kcal
Fat 15 g 0.6 g
Saturated fat 1.1 g 0.1 g
Sugars 1.2 g 0.5 g
Salt 2.2 g 1.9 g
Fiber 3.2 g 6.7 g
Protein 15 g 20.1 g
Additives31
AllergensSoybeansSoybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • This isn't bacon rashers has 45% fewer calories (120 kcal vs 218 kcal).
  • This isn't bacon rashers has 96% less fat (0.6 g vs 15 g).
  • This isn't bacon rashers has 91% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 1.1 g).
  • This isn't bacon rashers has 58% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.2 g).
  • This isn't bacon rashers has 52% more fiber (6.7 g vs 3.2 g).
  • This isn't bacon rashers has 25% more protein (20.1 g vs 15 g).
  • This isn't bacon rashers has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Plant-Based Bacon smoked

Rehydrated _soy_ proteins 81%, sunflower oil, salt, natural flavourings, colours (anthocyanins, lycopene), acidity regulator (potassium acetates)

This isn't bacon rashers

Plant-based bacon style rashers made from soya protein (29%). Water, SOYA Protein Concentrate, Flavouring, Salt, Vegetable Extracts (Radish, Carrot, Paprika), Dextrin, Rapeseed Oil, Smoke Flavouring, Iron, Vitamin B12.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Plant-Based Bacon smoked or This isn't bacon rashers?

Overall, This isn't bacon rashers has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

This isn't bacon rashers has fewer calories: 120 kcal versus 218 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

This isn't bacon rashers has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons