No pork streaky bacon rashers vs This isn't bacon rashers
Overall, This isn't bacon rashers has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
No pork streaky bacon rashers
This isn't bacon rashers
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | No pork streaky bacon rasher... | This isn't bacon rashers |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 223 kcal | 120 kcal |
| Fat | 14 g | 0.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.7 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 1.8 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 2 g | 1.9 g |
| Fiber | 7.7 g | 6.7 g |
| Protein | 10.9 g | 20.1 g |
| Additives | 6 | 1 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- This isn't bacon rashers has 46% fewer calories (120 kcal vs 223 kcal).
- This isn't bacon rashers has 96% less fat (0.6 g vs 14 g).
- This isn't bacon rashers has 94% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 1.7 g).
- This isn't bacon rashers has 72% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.8 g).
- No pork streaky bacon rashers has 13% more fiber (7.7 g vs 6.7 g).
- This isn't bacon rashers has 46% more protein (20.1 g vs 10.9 g).
- This isn't bacon rashers has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only No pork streaky bacon rashers lists: Gluten.
- Only This isn't bacon rashers lists: Soybeans.
Ingredients
No pork streaky bacon rashers
Water, Sunflower Oil, _Wheat_ Protein, Pea Protein, Thickeners (Methyl Cellulose, Carrageenan, Konjac Gum, Xanthan Gum, Sodium Alginate), Cornflour, Flavourings, Vegetable Fibre, Sea Salt, Yeast Extract, Smoke Flavouring, Maltodextrin, _Barley_ Malt Extract, Plant and Fruit Extracts (Hibiscus Concentrate, Black Carrot Concentrate, Peach Concentrate, Orange Concentrate).
This isn't bacon rashers
Plant-based bacon style rashers made from soya protein (29%). Water, SOYA Protein Concentrate, Flavouring, Salt, Vegetable Extracts (Radish, Carrot, Paprika), Dextrin, Rapeseed Oil, Smoke Flavouring, Iron, Vitamin B12.
FAQ
Which is healthier: No pork streaky bacon rashers or This isn't bacon rashers?
Overall, This isn't bacon rashers has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
This isn't bacon rashers has fewer calories: 120 kcal versus 223 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
This isn't bacon rashers has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.8 g per 100 g.