Pitted Prunes vs Piña
Overall, Pitted Prunes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pitted Prunes | Piña |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | d |
| NOVA group | 3 | 4 |
| Calories | 250 kcal | 26 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 35 g | 5.7 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 7.5 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 2.5 g | 0 g |
| Additives | 1 | 4 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Piña has 90% fewer calories (26 kcal vs 250 kcal).
- Piña has 84% less sugar (5.7 g vs 35 g).
- Pitted Prunes has 93% more fiber (7.5 g vs 0.5 g).
- Pitted Prunes has 100% more protein (2.5 g vs 0 g).
- Pitted Prunes has the better Nutri-Score.
- Pitted Prunes is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Pitted Prunes
Pitted dried prunes, Potassium sorbate
Piña
Zumo de piña a partir de concentrado (50%), agua, acidulante: ácido cítrico, vitaminas C, E y A, estabilizante: pectinas, edulcorantes: sucralosa y acesulfamo K.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pitted Prunes or Piña?
Overall, Pitted Prunes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Piña has fewer calories: 26 kcal versus 250 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Piña has less sugar: 5.7 g versus 35 g per 100 g.