Comparison

Pistazien sweet chili vs Wasabi Coated Pistachio

Overall, Wasabi Coated Pistachio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPistazien sweet chiliWasabi Coated Pistachio
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group — 4
Calories 617 kcal 471 kcal
Fat 50.3 g 27 g
Saturated fat 6.4 g 4.3 g
Sugars 6.6 g 14 g
Salt 0.7 g 1.1 g
Fiber — 22 g
Protein 24.2 g 24 g
Additives03
AllergensNone listedGluten, Mustard, Nuts, Peanuts, Soybeans

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Wasabi Coated Pistachio has 24% fewer calories (471 kcal vs 617 kcal).
  • Wasabi Coated Pistachio has 46% less fat (27 g vs 50.3 g).
  • Wasabi Coated Pistachio has 33% less saturated fat (4.3 g vs 6.4 g).
  • Pistazien sweet chili has 53% less sugar (6.6 g vs 14 g).
  • Pistazien sweet chili has 34% less salt (0.7 g vs 1.1 g).
  • Only Wasabi Coated Pistachio lists: Gluten, Mustard, Nuts, Peanuts, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Pistazien sweet chili

Not available.

Wasabi Coated Pistachio

Pistaches, sucre, farine de froment, farine de riz, sauce au soja (avec froment, colorant E150d), huile de riz, sel de cuisine, wasabi (raifort japonnais), moutarde en poudre, colorants E100, E141.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Pistazien sweet chili or Wasabi Coated Pistachio?

Overall, Wasabi Coated Pistachio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Wasabi Coated Pistachio has fewer calories: 471 kcal versus 617 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pistazien sweet chili has less sugar: 6.6 g versus 14 g per 100 g.

More comparisons