Pistachio Crisp Milk Chocolate Dates vs Chocodadels
Overall, Chocodadels has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Pistachio Crisp Milk Chocolate Dates
Chocodadels
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pistachio Crisp Milk Chocola... | Chocodadels |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 455 kcal | 345 kcal |
| Fat | 20 g | 17 g |
| Saturated fat | 11 g | 11 g |
| Sugars | 57 g | 29 g |
| Salt | 0.4 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 4.3 g | 10 g |
| Protein | 4.5 g | 4.5 g |
| Additives | 5 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Milk, Nuts, Soybeans | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chocodadels has 24% fewer calories (345 kcal vs 455 kcal).
- Chocodadels has 15% less fat (17 g vs 20 g).
- Chocodadels has 49% less sugar (29 g vs 57 g).
- Chocodadels has 57% more fiber (10 g vs 4.3 g).
- Chocodadels has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Pistachio Crisp Milk Chocolate Dates lists: Gluten, Milk, Nuts, Soybeans.
Ingredients
Pistachio Crisp Milk Chocolate Dates
Dates (42%), Sugar, Cocoa Butter, Whole Milk Powder, Pistachio paste (5%), Cocoa Mass, Wheat Flour, Emulsifier (soya lecithin), Concentrated Butter (milk), Salt, Natural Flavourings, Glazing Agent (gum arabic), Glucose Syrup, Milk Sugar, Milk Protein, Malt Extract (barley), Raising Agent (sodium bicarbonate).
Chocodadels
dadels 70%, chocolade 30% (cacaomassa, dadels, cacaoboter, cacaopoeder, emulgator: zonnebloemlecithine)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pistachio Crisp Milk Chocolate Dates or Chocodadels?
Overall, Chocodadels has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chocodadels has fewer calories: 345 kcal versus 455 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chocodadels has less sugar: 29 g versus 57 g per 100 g.