Pissaladière vs Pissaladière
Overall, Pissaladière has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pissaladière | Pissaladière |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 201 kcal | 207 kcal |
| Fat | 11 g | 11 g |
| Saturated fat | 5.4 g | 1.8 g |
| Sugars | 6.4 g | 6.4 g |
| Salt | 2.3 g | 2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 5.1 g | 3.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pissaladière has 67% less saturated fat (1.8 g vs 5.4 g).
- Pissaladière has 24% more protein (5.1 g vs 3.9 g).
- Pissaladière has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Pissaladière
Not available.
Pissaladière
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pissaladière or Pissaladière?
Overall, Pissaladière has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pissaladière has fewer calories: 201 kcal versus 207 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pissaladière has less sugar: 6.4 g versus 6.4 g per 100 g.