Pinsa vs Grillies XXL - Klassik
Overall, Pinsa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pinsa | Grillies XXL - Klassik |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 269 kcal | 287 kcal |
| Fat | 4.9 g | 6.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.9 g | 0.8 g |
| Sugars | 4.5 g | 4 g |
| Salt | 0.7 g | 1.1 g |
| Fiber | 3.6 g | 3.2 g |
| Protein | 9 g | 7.9 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pinsa has 21% less fat (4.9 g vs 6.2 g).
- Grillies XXL - Klassik has 11% less sugar (4 g vs 4.5 g).
- Pinsa has 36% less salt (0.7 g vs 1.1 g).
- Pinsa has 11% more fiber (3.6 g vs 3.2 g).
- Pinsa has 12% more protein (9 g vs 7.9 g).
- Only Pinsa lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Pinsa
Weichweizenmehl 59 %, Wasser, Hartweizengrieẞ 6,6 % Sauerteig 5,5 % (Wasser, Weizenmehl), natives Olivenöl extra 3,5 %, Salz, Weizenfaser, Bierhefe, Gerstenmalzmehl, Ethylalkohol. Kann Spuren von Soja und Senf enthalten. Mit Ethylalkohol behandelt.
Grillies XXL - Klassik
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pinsa or Grillies XXL - Klassik?
Overall, Pinsa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pinsa has fewer calories: 269 kcal versus 287 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Grillies XXL - Klassik has less sugar: 4 g versus 4.5 g per 100 g.