Knoblauchbutterbaguette vs Pinsa
Overall, Pinsa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Knoblauchbutterbaguette | Pinsa |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 317 kcal | 269 kcal |
| Fat | 13 g | 4.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 9.1 g | 0.9 g |
| Sugars | 2.2 g | 4.5 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 0.7 g |
| Fiber | — | 3.6 g |
| Protein | 7.1 g | 9 g |
| Additives | 1 | 1 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Milk | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pinsa has 15% fewer calories (269 kcal vs 317 kcal).
- Pinsa has 62% less fat (4.9 g vs 13 g).
- Pinsa has 90% less saturated fat (0.9 g vs 9.1 g).
- Knoblauchbutterbaguette has 51% less sugar (2.2 g vs 4.5 g).
- Pinsa has 30% less salt (0.7 g vs 1 g).
- Pinsa has 21% more protein (9 g vs 7.1 g).
- Pinsa has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Knoblauchbutterbaguette lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Knoblauchbutterbaguette
Weizenkleingebäck: Weizenmehl, Wasser, Hefe, jodiertes Speisesalz (Speisesalz, Kaliumiodat), Traubenzucker; Knoblauch-Butterzubereitung (20 %): Butter, Wasser, Knoblauch, Weizenstärke, jodiertes Speisesalz (Speisesalz, Kaliumiodat), Bärlauch, Säuerungsmittel: Citronensäure.
Pinsa
Weichweizenmehl 59 %, Wasser, Hartweizengrieẞ 6,6 % Sauerteig 5,5 % (Wasser, Weizenmehl), natives Olivenöl extra 3,5 %, Salz, Weizenfaser, Bierhefe, Gerstenmalzmehl, Ethylalkohol. Kann Spuren von Soja und Senf enthalten. Mit Ethylalkohol behandelt.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Knoblauchbutterbaguette or Pinsa?
Overall, Pinsa has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pinsa has fewer calories: 269 kcal versus 317 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Knoblauchbutterbaguette has less sugar: 2.2 g versus 4.5 g per 100 g.