Pesto Rosso vs Pesto Rustico Pomodori Secchi
Overall, Pesto Rustico Pomodori Secchi has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pesto Rosso | Pesto Rustico Pomodori Secch... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 319 kcal | 159 kcal |
| Fat | 30.2 g | 12.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.8 g | 1 g |
| Sugars | 6.5 g | 6.8 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 1.6 g |
| Fiber | 2.7 g | 2.8 g |
| Protein | 3.2 g | 2 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pesto Rustico Pomodori Secchi has 50% fewer calories (159 kcal vs 319 kcal).
- Pesto Rustico Pomodori Secchi has 59% less fat (12.5 g vs 30.2 g).
- Pesto Rustico Pomodori Secchi has 79% less saturated fat (1 g vs 4.8 g).
- Pesto Rosso has no salt, while Pesto Rustico Pomodori Secchi has 1.6 g.
- Pesto Rosso has 38% more protein (3.2 g vs 2 g).
- Only Pesto Rosso lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Pesto Rosso
extra virgin olive oil (27%), rehydrated sundried tomatoes (23%) paste, tomato purée, basil (7%), pecorino romano pdo cheese (3,5%) (milk) garlic parmigiano reggiano pdo cheese (2%) (milk), pine nuts (2%), sugar, salt, beetroot pr acidity regulator: lactic acid, antioxidant: ascorbic acid,
Pesto Rustico Pomodori Secchi
tomato pulp, sunflower oil, sundried tomatoes 10%, onion, basil, salt, garlic, sugar, oregano 0.4%, capers,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pesto Rosso or Pesto Rustico Pomodori Secchi?
Overall, Pesto Rustico Pomodori Secchi has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pesto Rustico Pomodori Secchi has fewer calories: 159 kcal versus 319 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pesto Rosso has less sugar: 6.5 g versus 6.8 g per 100 g.