Pesto rosso vs Pesto Rustico Pomodori Secchi
Overall, Pesto Rustico Pomodori Secchi has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pesto rosso | Pesto Rustico Pomodori Secch... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 270 kcal | 159 kcal |
| Fat | 24 g | 12.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.9 g | 1 g |
| Sugars | 6.1 g | 6.8 g |
| Salt | 1.8 g | 1.6 g |
| Fiber | 2.8 g | 2.8 g |
| Protein | 4.2 g | 2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk, Nuts | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pesto Rustico Pomodori Secchi has 41% fewer calories (159 kcal vs 270 kcal).
- Pesto Rustico Pomodori Secchi has 48% less fat (12.5 g vs 24 g).
- Pesto Rustico Pomodori Secchi has 66% less saturated fat (1 g vs 2.9 g).
- Pesto rosso has 10% less sugar (6.1 g vs 6.8 g).
- Pesto rosso has 52% more protein (4.2 g vs 2 g).
- Pesto Rustico Pomodori Secchi has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Pesto rosso lists: Milk, Nuts.
Ingredients
Pesto rosso
Tomates séchées réhydratées 33%, purée de tomates 32,8%, huile de tournesol, vinaigre de vin, basilic 3%, sel, noix de cajou, fromage Grana Padano AOP 2,3% (contient ceufs), huile d'olive, jus de citron. Peut contenir des traces d'arachides.
Pesto Rustico Pomodori Secchi
tomato pulp, sunflower oil, sundried tomatoes 10%, onion, basil, salt, garlic, sugar, oregano 0.4%, capers,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pesto rosso or Pesto Rustico Pomodori Secchi?
Overall, Pesto Rustico Pomodori Secchi has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pesto Rustico Pomodori Secchi has fewer calories: 159 kcal versus 270 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pesto rosso has less sugar: 6.1 g versus 6.8 g per 100 g.