Comparison

Perles de tapioca, coulis mangue vs Coulis de mangue

Overall, Coulis de mangue has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPerles de tapioca, coulis ma...Coulis de mangue
Nutri-Score d —
NOVA group 3 —
Calories 165 kcal 124 kcal
Fat 9.2 g 0.5 g
Saturated fat 8.5 g 0.1 g
Sugars 12.9 g 29 g
Salt 0.1 g —
Fiber 0.5 g —
Protein 1.7 g 0.5 g
Additives00
AllergensMilkNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Coulis de mangue has 25% fewer calories (124 kcal vs 165 kcal).
  • Coulis de mangue has 95% less fat (0.5 g vs 9.2 g).
  • Coulis de mangue has 99% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 8.5 g).
  • Perles de tapioca, coulis mangue has 56% less sugar (12.9 g vs 29 g).
  • Perles de tapioca, coulis mangue has 71% more protein (1.7 g vs 0.5 g).
  • Only Perles de tapioca, coulis mangue lists: Milk.

Ingredients

Perles de tapioca, coulis mangue

Lait de coco bio (pulpe de noix de coco bio, eau); LAIT demi-écrémé; purée de mangue (10%) (purée de mangue, sucre); sucre glace (sucre, fécule de pomme de terre); perle du Japon (5%) (farine de tapioca, eau); purée de fruit de la passion (fruit de la passion, sucre); sucre; fécule de tapioca. Bio: Ingrédients issus de l'agriculture biologique certifiés par Ecocert FR-BIO-01, agriculture UE/non UE (48,4 % sont des produits biologiques).

Coulis de mangue

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Perles de tapioca, coulis mangue or Coulis de mangue?

Overall, Coulis de mangue has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Coulis de mangue has fewer calories: 124 kcal versus 165 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Perles de tapioca, coulis mangue has less sugar: 12.9 g versus 29 g per 100 g.

More comparisons