Pelotazos futebolas vs Cuquis
Overall, Cuquis has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pelotazos futebolas | Cuquis |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 3 |
| Calories | 520 kcal | 473 kcal |
| Fat | 27.8 g | 17 g |
| Saturated fat | 4 g | 2 g |
| Sugars | 6.5 g | 0.7 g |
| Salt | 1.6 g | 1.5 g |
| Fiber | 1.4 g | 1.6 g |
| Protein | 5.4 g | 6.5 g |
| Additives | 5 | 0 |
| Allergens | Milk | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cuquis has 39% less fat (17 g vs 27.8 g).
- Cuquis has 50% less saturated fat (2 g vs 4 g).
- Cuquis has 89% less sugar (0.7 g vs 6.5 g).
- Cuquis has 17% more protein (6.5 g vs 5.4 g).
- Cuquis is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Pelotazos futebolas lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Pelotazos futebolas
Semoule de mais (73%), huile de maïs, saveur fromage lactose (a partir de la poudre de lactosérum (a partir de lait), poudre de fromage (à partir de lait, préparations aromatisantes et substances aromatisantes, exhausteurs de gout (glutamate monosodique, inosinate disodique et guanylate disodique), chlorure de potassium, arôme de fumée] sucre, sel, colorants (concentré de légumes, extrait de paprika)
Cuquis
corn (81%), sunflower oil (17%), salt
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pelotazos futebolas or Cuquis?
Overall, Cuquis has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cuquis has fewer calories: 473 kcal versus 520 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cuquis has less sugar: 0.7 g versus 6.5 g per 100 g.