Comparison
Pelmeni de boeuf vs Pelmeni mit Rindfleischfüllung
Overall, Pelmeni mit Rindfleischfüllung has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pelmeni de boeuf | Pelmeni mit Rindfleischfüllu... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 181 kcal | 176 kcal |
| Fat | 3.8 g | 4.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.6 g | 1.6 g |
| Sugars | 1.3 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.6 g | 1.3 g |
| Protein | 7.7 g | 10 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pelmeni mit Rindfleischfüllung has no sugar, while Pelmeni de boeuf has 1.3 g.
- Pelmeni mit Rindfleischfüllung has 19% less salt (1.3 g vs 1.6 g).
- Pelmeni mit Rindfleischfüllung has 23% more protein (10 g vs 7.7 g).
Ingredients
Pelmeni de boeuf
Not available.
Pelmeni mit Rindfleischfüllung
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pelmeni de boeuf or Pelmeni mit Rindfleischfüllung?
Overall, Pelmeni mit Rindfleischfüllung has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pelmeni mit Rindfleischfüllung has fewer calories: 176 kcal versus 181 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pelmeni mit Rindfleischfüllung has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.3 g per 100 g.