Comparison
Pelmeni de boeuf vs Pelmeni mit Hähnchenfleischfüllung
Overall, Pelmeni de boeuf has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pelmeni de boeuf | Pelmeni mit Hähnchenfleischf... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | c |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 181 kcal | 217 kcal |
| Fat | 3.8 g | 6.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.6 g | 2.2 g |
| Sugars | 1.3 g | 2.2 g |
| Salt | 1.6 g | 0.9 g |
| Protein | 7.7 g | 10 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pelmeni de boeuf has 17% fewer calories (181 kcal vs 217 kcal).
- Pelmeni de boeuf has 42% less fat (3.8 g vs 6.5 g).
- Pelmeni de boeuf has 27% less saturated fat (1.6 g vs 2.2 g).
- Pelmeni de boeuf has 41% less sugar (1.3 g vs 2.2 g).
- Pelmeni mit Hähnchenfleischfüllung has 46% less salt (0.9 g vs 1.6 g).
- Pelmeni mit Hähnchenfleischfüllung has 23% more protein (10 g vs 7.7 g).
Ingredients
Pelmeni de boeuf
Not available.
Pelmeni mit Hähnchenfleischfüllung
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pelmeni de boeuf or Pelmeni mit Hähnchenfleischfüllung?
Overall, Pelmeni de boeuf has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Pelmeni de boeuf has fewer calories: 181 kcal versus 217 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pelmeni de boeuf has less sugar: 1.3 g versus 2.2 g per 100 g.