Comparison

Pêches plates vs Cashews & Erdnüsse Honig & Salz

Overall, Pêches plates has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientPêches platesCashews & Erdnüsse Honig & S...
Nutri-Score a d
NOVA group 1 4
Calories 45 kcal 543 kcal
Fat 0.3 g 34 g
Saturated fat 0 g 5 g
Sugars 8.2 g 32.8 g
Salt 0 g 0.8 g
Fiber 1.6 g 3.2 g
Protein 1.1 g 14.1 g
Additives01
AllergensNone listedNuts, Peanuts

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Pêches plates has 92% fewer calories (45 kcal vs 543 kcal).
  • Pêches plates has 99% less fat (0.3 g vs 34 g).
  • Pêches plates has 99% less saturated fat (0 g vs 5 g).
  • Pêches plates has 75% less sugar (8.2 g vs 32.8 g).
  • Pêches plates has 99% less salt (0 g vs 0.8 g).
  • Cashews & Erdnüsse Honig & Salz has 50% more fiber (3.2 g vs 1.6 g).
  • Cashews & Erdnüsse Honig & Salz has 92% more protein (14.1 g vs 1.1 g).
  • Pêches plates has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Pêches plates is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Cashews & Erdnüsse Honig & Salz lists: Nuts, Peanuts.

Ingredients

Pêches plates

Pêche plate.

Cashews & Erdnüsse Honig & Salz

33% Cashewkerne, 32% Erdnusskerne, Zucker, 3% Honigpulver, Sonnenblumenöl, Verdickungsmittel: Gummi arabicum; Speisesalz. Das Produkt kann Spuren von anderen Schalenfrüchten enthalten. Trocken lagern und vor Wärme schützen. Warnung: Kleine Kinder können an Nüssen ersticken.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Pêches plates or Cashews & Erdnüsse Honig & Salz?

Overall, Pêches plates has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Pêches plates has fewer calories: 45 kcal versus 543 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Pêches plates has less sugar: 8.2 g versus 32.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons