Pêche Plaisir de fruits vs Compotes de pommes
Overall, Compotes de pommes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pêche Plaisir de fruits | Compotes de pommes |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 1 |
| Calories | 57 kcal | 52 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 11 g | 11 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 1.2 g | 2.1 g |
| Protein | 0.7 g | 0.5 g |
| Additives | 2 | 1 |
| Allergens | None | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Pêche Plaisir de fruits has no fat, while Compotes de pommes has 0.5 g.
- Compotes de pommes has 43% more fiber (2.1 g vs 1.2 g).
- Compotes de pommes is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Pêche Plaisir de fruits lists: None.
Ingredients
Pêche Plaisir de fruits
Pêches en cubes, jus de raisin à base de concentré, arôme naturel, antioxydant : acide ascorbique, acidifiant : acide citrique.
Compotes de pommes
Purée de pommes 99%, anti-oxydant : acide ascorbique.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pêche Plaisir de fruits or Compotes de pommes?
Overall, Compotes de pommes has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Compotes de pommes has fewer calories: 52 kcal versus 57 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pêche Plaisir de fruits has less sugar: 11 g versus 11 g per 100 g.